Ottawa vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,465,619 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within Ottawa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.562. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ottawa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.159% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ottawa corresponds to an increase of 159.3 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,101 compared to $52,074, a difference of 40.4%), median family income ($86,380 compared to $118,440, a difference of 37.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,012 compared to $107,912, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.4%), householder income under 25 years ($47,366 compared to $53,739, a difference of 13.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,217 compared to $66,891, a difference of 25.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Australian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 36.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 34.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.97%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 36.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 27.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.0% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 13.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.0% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.5% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Australian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.5% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 23.5%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.3%), and single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.0% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 0.27%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.74%), and currently married (46.5% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 36.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 0.17%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Australian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 71.7%), master's degree (11.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 55.0%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 51.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 36.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 26.9%), and male disability (14.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 4.2%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 16.3%).