Nicaraguan vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,318,488 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Australians within Nicaraguan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.312. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nicaraguans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nicaraguans corresponds to a decrease of 6.8 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,372 compared to $52,074, a difference of 32.3%), median family income ($92,231 compared to $118,440, a difference of 28.4%), and median male earnings ($49,215 compared to $62,857, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,275 compared to $53,739, a difference of 0.87%), median female earnings ($36,904 compared to $43,308, a difference of 17.3%), and wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 20.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Australian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 67.7%), married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 55.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 51.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.1%), single male poverty (12.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and single female poverty (21.3% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Australian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.32%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.4% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 16.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 30.0%), births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 23.9%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 4.8%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and family households (67.4% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Australian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 6.1%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.43%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 81.8%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 59.8%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 20.1%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 16.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.9%).