French American Indian vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,826,740 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.856. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.114% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to an increase of 114.5 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,244 compared to $52,074, a difference of 29.4%), median family income ($92,872 compared to $118,440, a difference of 27.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,811 compared to $113,533, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,977 compared to $53,739, a difference of 9.7%), wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 11.1%), and median female earnings ($36,920 compared to $43,308, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 40.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (20.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 34.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 7.2%), single father poverty (17.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 10.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 27.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 23.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 23.9%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 23.4%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.4% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 0.65%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.1%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 0.23%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 56.6%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 51.9%), and master's degree (12.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 44.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.44%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 27.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 20.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 4.1%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 5.9%).