Brazilian vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,322,458 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Australians within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to a decrease of 3.5 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,700 compared to $52,074, a difference of 11.5%), median family income ($106,942 compared to $118,440, a difference of 10.7%), and median male earnings ($56,837 compared to $62,857, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,335 compared to $53,739, a difference of 1.1%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and median female earnings ($40,483 compared to $43,308, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 16.5%), receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 15.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.010%), single female poverty (20.1% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.3%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.85%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.39%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 12.1%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.6%), and family households (63.9% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 21.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 15.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.030%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 27.5%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 18.0%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.45%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Australian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 9.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.26%), female disability (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.82%).