Immigrants from Uganda vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,906,955 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.630. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.065% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to an increase of 65.1 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,043 compared to $52,074, a difference of 15.6%), wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 13.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,698 compared to $107,912, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,374 compared to $53,739, a difference of 2.6%), median female earnings ($40,739 compared to $43,308, a difference of 6.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,976 compared to $66,891, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Australian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 23.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 20.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.010%), single female poverty (20.3% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 25.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.2% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.65%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.9%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.5%), and married-couple households (44.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.7% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 0.16%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Australian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 10.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 9.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.030%), no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.99%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 43.0%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.7%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.58%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.59%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 20.0%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 10.5%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.49%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.56%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.89%).