Immigrants from Belarus vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,055,194 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within Immigrant from Belarus communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.369. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belarus within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.130% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belarus corresponds to an increase of 130.0 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Australian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 9.5%), householder income over 65 years ($62,162 compared to $66,891, a difference of 7.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,743 compared to $53,739, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($62,658 compared to $62,857, a difference of 0.32%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,393 compared to $107,912, a difference of 0.48%), and median earnings ($53,043 compared to $52,294, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Australian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 24.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 19.9%), and receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.20%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.81%), and poverty (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 12.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.90%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.4% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 13.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.91%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.1%), births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 15.2%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.41%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.54%), and currently married (48.1% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 65.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 38.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 8.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.9% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 18.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 29.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 29.0%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.3%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.51%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 34.9%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.25%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 3.0%).