Immigrants from Northern Europe vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,253,720 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within Immigrant from Northern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.623. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Northern Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.084% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Northern Europe corresponds to an increase of 83.8 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,159 compared to $52,074, a difference of 4.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,930 compared to $113,533, a difference of 3.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($111,676 compared to $107,912, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.99%), householder income under 25 years ($54,571 compared to $53,739, a difference of 1.5%), and median female earnings ($44,366 compared to $43,308, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Australian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 7.3%), female poverty (11.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and poverty (10.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.97%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 9.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.5% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.98%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.90%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.5%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and births to unmarried women (28.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.19%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.96%), and family households (63.8% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 5.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.61%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Australian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.3%), master's degree (19.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.0% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.030%), 10th grade (95.2% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 6.5%), cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.37%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.58%), and female disability (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.99%).