Immigrants from Switzerland vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,101,185 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within Immigrant from Switzerland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.564. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Switzerland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.225% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Switzerland corresponds to an increase of 224.9 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,866 compared to $52,074, a difference of 5.4%), householder income over 65 years ($69,343 compared to $66,891, a difference of 3.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,934 compared to $113,533, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,528 compared to $53,739, a difference of 0.40%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($109,185 compared to $107,912, a difference of 1.2%), and median household income ($97,979 compared to $96,490, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Australian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 7.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.14%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.73%), and receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 21.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.80%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.39%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.9%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and family households with children (25.7% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.030%), currently married (46.9% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (61.6% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 21.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 11.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Australian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 28.9%), professional degree (7.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 20.3%), and master's degree (20.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.1% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 24.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 7.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.030%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.57%), and disability age over 75 (45.3% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 0.73%).