Blackfeet vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 160,624,623 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within Blackfeet communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.222. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Blackfeet within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.137% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Blackfeet corresponds to an increase of 137.2 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,695 compared to $52,074, a difference of 38.1%), median family income ($88,717 compared to $118,440, a difference of 33.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,531 compared to $107,912, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,603 compared to $53,739, a difference of 10.6%), wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 11.7%), and median female earnings ($35,864 compared to $43,308, a difference of 20.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Australian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 48.4%), family poverty (11.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 43.9%), and married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 13.7%), single mother poverty (33.2% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 17.3%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 17.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 25.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 23.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 34.3%), births to unmarried women (37.9% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 28.4%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Australian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 6.9%), no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 0.54%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.60%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Australian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 69.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 59.4%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.33%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 30.7%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 27.5%), and ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 6.4%), disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 14.4%).