Immigrants from Australia vs Ugandan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,840,540 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Immigrant from Australia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.346. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Australia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.162% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Australia corresponds to an increase of 162.4 Ugandans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,953 compared to $45,047, a difference of 28.6%), median male earnings ($67,634 compared to $55,290, a difference of 22.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($115,947 compared to $96,667, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,660 compared to $50,923, a difference of 11.3%), householder income over 65 years ($69,164 compared to $61,177, a difference of 13.1%), and median female earnings ($46,573 compared to $40,889, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 33.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 25.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.92%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 44.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 27.6%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.2%), and births to unmarried women (26.6% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.3% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 0.67%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.4%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 21.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.4% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.4% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 35.0%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.8%), and master's degree (20.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.33%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 17.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.6%).