Alaska Native vs Ugandan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,260,055 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Alaska Native communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.809. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaska Natives within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.146% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaska Natives corresponds to an increase of 146.4 Ugandans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,558 compared to $45,047, a difference of 13.9%), median family income ($95,573 compared to $106,541, a difference of 11.5%), and median male earnings ($49,711 compared to $55,290, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($60,748 compared to $61,177, a difference of 0.71%), wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,000 compared to $50,923, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 27.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 25.4%), and single male poverty (15.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (17.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.63%), male poverty (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (14.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 90.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 73.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (7.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 54.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 16.6%), and female unemployment (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (81.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.66%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 51.2%), births to unmarried women (38.3% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 27.3%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.5% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 2.9%), married-couple households (45.6% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.23, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 52.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 28.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 0.21%), 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 54.6%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 47.8%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.6% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.12%), high school diploma (89.9% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and 11th grade (93.5% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 158.8%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 56.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.1%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 4.6%).