Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Ugandan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,147,924 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Immigrant from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.062. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia corresponds to a decrease of 0.6 Ugandans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,714 compared to $50,923, a difference of 9.4%), householder income over 65 years ($64,089 compared to $61,177, a difference of 4.8%), and median household income ($91,541 compared to $87,557, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,241 compared to $55,290, a difference of 0.090%), median family income ($106,252 compared to $106,541, a difference of 0.27%), and median earnings ($47,671 compared to $47,854, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.8% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 24.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 15.2%), and male poverty (10.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.0%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 46.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.97%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (48.4% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 10.4%), family households (67.5% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and currently married (47.1% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 0.90%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and divorced or separated (11.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 43.8%), no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 32.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.6% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 29.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 41.3%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 29.4%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.89%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.89%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 10.8%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.65%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.91%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.0%).