Immigrants from North Macedonia vs Ugandan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,284,253 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Immigrant from North Macedonia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from North Macedonia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from North Macedonia corresponds to an increase of 17.3 Ugandans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North Macedonia and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.4% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 18.1%), householder income under 25 years ($56,503 compared to $50,923, a difference of 11.0%), and median male earnings ($59,189 compared to $55,290, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,175 compared to $61,177, a difference of 0.0%), median female earnings ($40,488 compared to $40,889, a difference of 0.99%), and per capita income ($45,622 compared to $45,047, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North Macedonia and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (9.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 29.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.6% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 25.8%), and poverty (10.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.24%), single mother poverty (27.5% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North Macedonia and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 46.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 42.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North Macedonia and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.92%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.32%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North Macedonia and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.5%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.8%), and currently married (48.5% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.2%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North Macedonia and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.28%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.71%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North Macedonia and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 37.2%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.2%), and master's degree (15.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North Macedonia and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 15.9%), and cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.50%), female disability (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.65%), and disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.76%).