Immigrants from Thailand vs Ugandan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Thailand
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ugandan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Thailand

Ugandans

Fair
Average
3,353
SOCIAL INDEX
31.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
224th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,220
SOCIAL INDEX
59.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
159th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ugandan Integration in Immigrants from Thailand Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,309,528 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Immigrant from Thailand communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.271. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Thailand within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.092% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Thailand corresponds to an increase of 91.7 Ugandans.
Immigrants from Thailand Integration in Ugandan Communities

Immigrants from Thailand vs Ugandan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($99,840 compared to $106,541, a difference of 6.7%), per capita income ($42,289 compared to $45,047, a difference of 6.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,400 compared to $103,472, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,645 compared to $50,923, a difference of 0.55%), householder income over 65 years ($60,217 compared to $61,177, a difference of 1.6%), and wage/income gap (24.5% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Ugandan Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ThailandUgandan
Per Capita Income
Poor
$42,289
Excellent
$45,047
Median Family Income
Poor
$99,840
Excellent
$106,541
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,327
Excellent
$87,557
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,598
Excellent
$47,854
Median Male Earnings
Poor
$52,908
Good
$55,290
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,810
Exceptional
$40,889
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,645
Tragic
$50,923
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,337
Good
$96,667
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$97,400
Excellent
$103,472
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Fair
$60,217
Average
$61,177
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.5%
Exceptional
24.1%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Ugandan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 7.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and single female poverty (22.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.32%), receiving food stamps (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Ugandan Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ThailandUgandan
Poverty
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
13.1%
Families
Tragic
9.7%
Fair
9.3%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Poor
14.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
22.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Good
13.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.3%
Poor
18.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Poor
17.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Poor
17.2%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Females
Tragic
22.0%
Good
20.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.8%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.9%
Good
28.8%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Poor
11.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.2%
Good
11.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Poor
12.4%
Fair
12.2%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Ugandan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 44.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 14.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.93%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Ugandan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ThailandUgandan
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Good
5.2%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.8%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.8%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Good
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
12.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.4%
Tragic
5.9%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Ugandan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Ugandan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ThailandUgandan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Exceptional
67.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Exceptional
80.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Exceptional
38.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.4%
Good
75.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.5%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
83.7%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Ugandan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.8% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 8.9%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.3%), and single mother households (6.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.0%), currently married (45.4% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.9%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Ugandan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ThailandUgandan
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Tragic
61.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Tragic
43.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.9%
Fair
6.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.4%
Tragic
44.2%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
32.8%
Excellent
30.1%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Ugandan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.3%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 20.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 15.3%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Ugandan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ThailandUgandan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
11.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.6%
Tragic
88.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Tragic
53.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.5%
Tragic
17.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Ugandan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 31.8%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 21.2%), and master's degree (14.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.68%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.68%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.69%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Ugandan Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ThailandUgandan
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.3%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Average
97.6%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Average
97.4%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Good
96.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Good
95.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Good
95.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.8%
Excellent
94.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.6%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.1%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Excellent
89.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.5%
Good
86.1%
College, Under 1 year
Fair
64.7%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.6%
Exceptional
61.2%
Associate's Degree
Poor
45.1%
Exceptional
48.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Poor
36.5%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.2%
Exceptional
17.1%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Exceptional
2.2%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Ugandan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.94%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.3%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Ugandan Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ThailandUgandan
Disability
Tragic
12.0%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.7%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.0%
Average
11.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.3%
Excellent
22.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.3%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%