Cambodian vs Ugandan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cambodian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ugandan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cambodians

Ugandans

Exceptional
Average
9,346
SOCIAL INDEX
90.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
19th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,220
SOCIAL INDEX
59.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
159th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ugandan Integration in Cambodian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,130,233 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Cambodian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.065. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cambodians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cambodians corresponds to a decrease of 14.0 Ugandans.
Cambodian Integration in Ugandan Communities

Cambodian vs Ugandan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,731 compared to $45,047, a difference of 14.8%), median male earnings ($62,516 compared to $55,290, a difference of 13.1%), and median earnings ($53,386 compared to $47,854, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 7.5%), householder income under 25 years ($55,571 compared to $50,923, a difference of 9.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,892 compared to $61,177, a difference of 9.3%).
Cambodian vs Ugandan Income
Income MetricCambodianUgandan
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$51,731
Excellent
$45,047
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$117,780
Excellent
$106,541
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$96,324
Excellent
$87,557
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,386
Excellent
$47,854
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$62,516
Good
$55,290
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$45,014
Exceptional
$40,889
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,571
Tragic
$50,923
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$107,148
Good
$96,667
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$114,342
Excellent
$103,472
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,892
Average
$61,177
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Exceptional
24.1%

Cambodian vs Ugandan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 28.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 25.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.96%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and single male poverty (11.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 4.5%).
Cambodian vs Ugandan Poverty
Poverty MetricCambodianUgandan
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.1%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Fair
9.3%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.2%
Poor
14.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.4%
Tragic
22.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Good
13.4%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Poor
18.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Poor
17.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Poor
17.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.2%
Good
20.8%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.4%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.0%
Good
28.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.5%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.4%
Poor
11.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Good
11.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Fair
12.2%

Cambodian vs Ugandan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 59.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 28.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.46%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.72%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.73%).
Cambodian vs Ugandan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCambodianUgandan
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.9%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.9%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
5.9%
Good
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.5%
Tragic
12.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.9%

Cambodian vs Ugandan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.0% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.1% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.2% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.54%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 0.11%).
Cambodian vs Ugandan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCambodianUgandan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.4%
Exceptional
67.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.1%
Exceptional
80.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.0%
Exceptional
38.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.2%
Good
75.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.0%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.2%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.3%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.1%
Exceptional
83.7%

Cambodian vs Ugandan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 22.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.5%), and births to unmarried women (26.7% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.4% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 0.53%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.4%).
Cambodian vs Ugandan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCambodianUgandan
Family Households
Tragic
61.4%
Tragic
61.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.5%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Tragic
43.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Fair
6.5%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Tragic
44.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.7%
Excellent
30.1%

Cambodian vs Ugandan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.3% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 0.37%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.18%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.3% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 0.37%).
Cambodian vs Ugandan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCambodianUgandan
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Tragic
11.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Tragic
88.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.3%
Tragic
53.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
17.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
5.7%

Cambodian vs Ugandan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (20.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 16.7%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.6%), and bachelor's degree (47.2% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.3% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.14%), 3rd grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.15%).
Cambodian vs Ugandan Education Level
Education Level MetricCambodianUgandan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.1%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Average
97.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Average
97.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Good
96.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Good
95.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Good
95.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Excellent
94.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Excellent
89.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.2%
Good
86.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.9%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.7%
Exceptional
61.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Exceptional
48.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
47.2%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.0%
Exceptional
17.1%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%

Cambodian vs Ugandan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 15.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.41%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.6%).
Cambodian vs Ugandan Disability
Disability MetricCambodianUgandan
Disability
Exceptional
10.8%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Average
11.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.8%
Excellent
22.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.1%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Fair
17.3%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.3%