Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Ugandan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ugandan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia

Ugandans

Excellent
Average
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,220
SOCIAL INDEX
59.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
159th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ugandan Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,865,330 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.429. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.678% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 677.8 Ugandans.
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Ugandan Communities

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Ugandan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $45,047, a difference of 14.9%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 13.4%), and median male earnings ($62,217 compared to $55,290, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $40,889, a difference of 6.6%), householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $50,923, a difference of 6.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,914 compared to $103,472, a difference of 8.2%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Ugandan Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaUgandan
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$51,770
Excellent
$45,047
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$116,165
Excellent
$106,541
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,319
Excellent
$87,557
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,361
Excellent
$47,854
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$62,217
Good
$55,290
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,571
Exceptional
$40,889
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,352
Tragic
$50,923
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$106,888
Good
$96,667
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,914
Excellent
$103,472
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,376
Average
$61,177
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Exceptional
24.1%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Ugandan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 27.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 22.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.32%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.9%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Ugandan Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaUgandan
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
13.1%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Fair
9.3%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Poor
14.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
22.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Good
13.4%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Poor
18.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Poor
17.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Poor
17.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Good
20.8%
Single Fathers
Good
16.2%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Good
28.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Poor
11.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Good
11.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Fair
12.2%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Ugandan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 33.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.84%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.92%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Ugandan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaUgandan
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.8%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.0%
Good
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Tragic
12.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
5.9%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Ugandan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.81%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.51%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Ugandan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaUgandan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Exceptional
67.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Exceptional
80.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Average
36.6%
Exceptional
38.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.0%
Good
75.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Exceptional
83.7%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Ugandan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 22.0%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.9%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.75%), family households (63.4% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.9%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Ugandan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaUgandan
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Tragic
61.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.2%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Tragic
43.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Fair
6.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
44.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.4%
Excellent
30.1%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Ugandan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.9%), no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.62%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Ugandan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaUgandan
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
11.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.3%
Tragic
88.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
54.1%
Tragic
53.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
17.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Ugandan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.8%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.5%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Ugandan Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaUgandan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Average
97.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Average
97.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Good
96.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Good
95.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Good
95.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Excellent
94.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Excellent
89.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Good
86.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.6%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.1%
Exceptional
61.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.9%
Exceptional
48.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.0%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.5%
Exceptional
17.1%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Ugandan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 13.6%), and cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.54%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.79%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.6%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Ugandan Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaUgandan
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Average
11.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.0%
Excellent
22.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.2%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%