Norwegian vs Ugandan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Norwegian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ugandan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Norwegians

Ugandans

Excellent
Average
8,521
SOCIAL INDEX
82.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
68th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,220
SOCIAL INDEX
59.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
159th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ugandan Integration in Norwegian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,844,571 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.377. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.073% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to an increase of 73.0 Ugandans.
Norwegian Integration in Ugandan Communities

Norwegian vs Ugandan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 20.3%), median female earnings ($38,802 compared to $40,889, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,127 compared to $50,923, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,104 compared to $61,177, a difference of 0.12%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,682 compared to $103,472, a difference of 0.20%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,866 compared to $96,667, a difference of 0.21%).
Norwegian vs Ugandan Income
Income MetricNorwegianUgandan
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,480
Excellent
$45,047
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,144
Excellent
$106,541
Median Household Income
Good
$86,084
Excellent
$87,557
Median Earnings
Good
$46,865
Excellent
$47,854
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$55,965
Good
$55,290
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,802
Exceptional
$40,889
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,127
Tragic
$50,923
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,866
Good
$96,667
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,682
Excellent
$103,472
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,104
Average
$61,177
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.0%
Exceptional
24.1%

Norwegian vs Ugandan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 43.6%), receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 36.7%), and family poverty (6.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.8% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.060%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.2%).
Norwegian vs Ugandan Poverty
Poverty MetricNorwegianUgandan
Poverty
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
13.1%
Families
Exceptional
6.9%
Fair
9.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Poor
14.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
22.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Good
13.4%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Poor
18.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Poor
17.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Poor
17.2%
Single Males
Fair
12.9%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Females
Good
20.8%
Good
20.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.4%
Good
28.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.7%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
8.7%
Poor
11.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Good
11.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.0%
Fair
12.2%

Norwegian vs Ugandan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 44.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 33.9%), and unemployment (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
Norwegian vs Ugandan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricNorwegianUgandan
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.2%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Exceptional
4.2%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
9.8%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.0%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Good
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
12.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.9%

Norwegian vs Ugandan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 18.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (80.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.37%).
Norwegian vs Ugandan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricNorwegianUgandan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Exceptional
67.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Exceptional
80.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
46.2%
Exceptional
38.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
80.1%
Good
75.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.7%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.4%
Exceptional
83.7%

Norwegian vs Ugandan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.8%), currently married (50.2% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 13.4%), and married-couple households (49.5% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.32%), births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.9%).
Norwegian vs Ugandan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricNorwegianUgandan
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Tragic
61.7%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.5%
Tragic
43.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.08
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Fair
6.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
50.2%
Tragic
44.2%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.3%
Excellent
30.1%

Norwegian vs Ugandan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 77.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 39.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 5.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 17.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 34.3%).
Norwegian vs Ugandan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricNorwegianUgandan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
11.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.7%
Tragic
88.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
62.8%
Tragic
53.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.9%
Tragic
17.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
5.7%

Norwegian vs Ugandan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 52.0%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.1%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (61.7% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 0.73%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.76%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.77%).
Norwegian vs Ugandan Education Level
Education Level MetricNorwegianUgandan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.3%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.7%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Average
97.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Average
97.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Good
96.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Good
95.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Good
95.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Excellent
94.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
95.2%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
94.0%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.5%
Excellent
89.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.0%
Good
86.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.4%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.7%
Exceptional
61.2%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
47.6%
Exceptional
48.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.5%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Exceptional
17.1%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Exceptional
2.2%

Norwegian vs Ugandan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 47.5%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.5%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.7%).
Norwegian vs Ugandan Disability
Disability MetricNorwegianUgandan
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.7%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.6%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.5%
Average
11.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.5%
Excellent
22.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.5%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.3%