Alaskan Athabascan vs Ugandan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Ugandan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Ugandans
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,220
SOCIAL INDEX
59.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
159th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ugandan Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,752,172 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 3.005% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 3,004.9 Ugandans.
Alaskan Athabascan vs Ugandan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,163 compared to $45,047, a difference of 15.0%), median household income ($76,383 compared to $87,557, a difference of 14.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $103,472, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $50,923, a difference of 1.5%), householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $61,177, a difference of 1.9%), and wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 7.1%).
Income Metric | Alaskan Athabascan | Ugandan |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,163 | Excellent $45,047 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $94,429 | Excellent $106,541 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $76,383 | Excellent $87,557 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,393 | Excellent $47,854 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,748 | Good $55,290 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,905 | Exceptional $40,889 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,713 | Tragic $50,923 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $88,446 | Good $96,667 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $90,951 | Excellent $103,472 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,330 | Average $61,177 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.8% | Exceptional 24.1% |
Alaskan Athabascan vs Ugandan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 42.9%), single male poverty (16.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 30.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.3%).
Poverty Metric | Alaskan Athabascan | Ugandan |
Poverty | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 13.1% |
Families | Tragic 10.1% | Fair 9.3% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 12.2% |
Females | Tragic 14.4% | Poor 14.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.5% | Tragic 22.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 19.1% | Good 13.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Poor 18.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.5% | Poor 17.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.6% | Poor 17.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.3% | Poor 17.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.6% | Good 20.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.1% | Average 16.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.3% | Good 28.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.1% | Fair 5.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.6% | Poor 11.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.4% | Good 11.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Fair 12.2% |
Alaskan Athabascan vs Ugandan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 79.9%), male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 78.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 74.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 7.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Alaskan Athabascan | Ugandan |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.7% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Fair 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.2% | Average 11.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Fair 17.7% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.6% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 10.8% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 8.6% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 8.4% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 11.0% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.1% | Good 7.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.5% | Tragic 12.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
Alaskan Athabascan vs Ugandan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 4.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Alaskan Athabascan | Ugandan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.8% | Exceptional 67.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.9% | Exceptional 80.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 45.2% | Exceptional 38.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 79.1% | Good 75.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.3% | Exceptional 85.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.7% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.3% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.8% | Exceptional 83.7% |
Alaskan Athabascan vs Ugandan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 45.7%), births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 25.4%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.8% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 0.18%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and married-couple households (43.6% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 0.45%).
Family Structure Metric | Alaskan Athabascan | Ugandan |
Family Households | Tragic 61.8% | Tragic 61.7% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.6% | Tragic 43.8% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.27 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.4% | Good 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.3% | Fair 6.5% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.6% | Tragic 44.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.7% | Excellent 30.1% |
Alaskan Athabascan vs Ugandan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 41.1%), no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 36.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 3.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 23.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Alaskan Athabascan | Ugandan |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 11.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.0% | Tragic 88.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Average 55.2% | Tragic 53.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.9% | Tragic 17.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 5.7% |
Alaskan Athabascan vs Ugandan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 48.1%), bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 41.7%), and no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.80%), nursery school (98.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.81%), and kindergarten (98.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.83%).
Education Level Metric | Alaskan Athabascan | Ugandan |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Good 2.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.8% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.8% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.7% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.7% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 97.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Average 97.4% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Good 97.1% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Good 96.2% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Good 95.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Good 95.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Excellent 94.0% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.9% | Excellent 92.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.3% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.3% | Good 86.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.0% | Excellent 66.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.4% | Exceptional 61.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 36.5% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.8% | Exceptional 40.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.6% | Exceptional 17.1% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Poor 1.7% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Alaskan Athabascan vs Ugandan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 85.5%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 51.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (32.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.0%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.2%).
Disability Metric | Alaskan Athabascan | Ugandan |
Disability | Tragic 14.4% | Excellent 11.4% |
Males | Tragic 14.9% | Excellent 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 13.9% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.4% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.7% | Average 11.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.4% | Excellent 22.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 54.0% | Exceptional 46.3% |
Vision | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 5.3% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 18.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Poor 2.5% | Exceptional 2.3% |