Immigrants from Jordan vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 179,223,856 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.067% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to a decrease of 66.5 Sub-Saharan Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,164 compared to $90,691, a difference of 17.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,185 compared to $84,235, a difference of 15.4%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $48,691, a difference of 5.5%), median female earnings ($40,977 compared to $38,391, a difference of 6.7%), and median earnings ($48,673 compared to $44,118, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 31.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.6% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 29.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.6%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 9.8%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.2%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.91%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 29.1%), births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 26.6%), and married-couple households (47.7% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.16%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (65.0% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 41.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 15.7%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 15.2%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.27%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 21.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.8%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.6%).