Immigrants from Sweden vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 161,646,601 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Immigrant from Sweden communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.331. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sweden within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.252% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sweden corresponds to an increase of 252.1 Sub-Saharan Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,582 compared to $40,152, a difference of 38.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,010 compared to $84,235, a difference of 33.0%), and median family income ($122,765 compared to $93,748, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,621 compared to $48,691, a difference of 10.1%), median female earnings ($44,774 compared to $38,391, a difference of 16.6%), and wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 23.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 51.8%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 40.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 6.1%), single father poverty (15.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 11.5%), and single male poverty (12.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 28.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 24.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 75.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.85%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 45.6%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 28.4%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.5% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 0.72%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.25, a difference of 3.6%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 12.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 63.4%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 62.3%), and master's degree (20.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.61%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.62%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 27.5%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 22.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 4.7%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and male disability (10.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 10.2%).