Choctaw vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison
COMPARE
Choctaw
Subsaharan African
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Choctaw
Sub-Saharan Africans
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
977
SOCIAL INDEX
7.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
330th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Subsaharan African Integration in Choctaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 258,227,902 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.114. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to a decrease of 11.4 Sub-Saharan Africans.
Choctaw vs Subsaharan African Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 23.3%), median female earnings ($33,775 compared to $38,391, a difference of 13.7%), and per capita income ($35,999 compared to $40,152, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $50,408, a difference of 5.6%), householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $56,615, a difference of 6.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $48,691, a difference of 7.1%).
Income Metric | Choctaw | Subsaharan African |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,999 | Tragic $40,152 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $84,835 | Tragic $93,748 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $69,947 | Tragic $77,631 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,270 | Tragic $44,118 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,729 | Tragic $50,408 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,775 | Tragic $38,391 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,450 | Tragic $48,691 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $78,168 | Tragic $84,235 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,287 | Tragic $90,691 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,060 | Tragic $56,615 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.1% | Exceptional 22.8% |
Choctaw vs Subsaharan African Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (17.0% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 24.0%), single father poverty (20.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 22.4%), and single female poverty (27.2% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 3.5%), child poverty among girls under 16 (21.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 5.6%).
Poverty Metric | Choctaw | Subsaharan African |
Poverty | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 13.3% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.3% | Tragic 22.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 15.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.5% | Tragic 20.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.3% | Tragic 20.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.1% | Tragic 20.1% |
Single Males | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 13.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 23.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 16.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.4% | Tragic 31.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.4% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.5% | Tragic 13.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 14.1% |
Choctaw vs Subsaharan African Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 16.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.73%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.74%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Choctaw | Subsaharan African |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 6.0% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Tragic 11.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 8.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.9% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Choctaw vs Subsaharan African Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 75.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Choctaw | Subsaharan African |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.5% | Exceptional 66.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.4% | Poor 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Exceptional 38.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.7% | Exceptional 75.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.0% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.4% | Poor 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.5% | Tragic 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.2% | Tragic 82.0% |
Choctaw vs Subsaharan African Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.2%), divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 10.9%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 0.62%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Choctaw | Subsaharan African |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.0% | Tragic 41.6% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.21 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.8% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.3% | Tragic 42.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 12.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.9% | Tragic 36.7% |
Choctaw vs Subsaharan African Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 54.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 36.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 14.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 28.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Choctaw | Subsaharan African |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 12.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.2% | Tragic 87.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.3% | Tragic 51.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Tragic 17.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Choctaw vs Subsaharan African Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 29.1%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.0%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (91.8% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.070%), high school diploma (87.8% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and 12th grade, no diploma (89.8% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.31%).
Education Level Metric | Choctaw | Subsaharan African |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 97.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Tragic 96.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.2% | Tragic 95.3% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.1% | Tragic 94.4% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Tragic 93.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Tragic 91.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.8% | Tragic 90.1% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.8% | Tragic 87.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.1% | Tragic 84.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Tragic 63.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 52.3% | Tragic 57.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.8% | Tragic 43.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 29.4% | Tragic 35.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.0% | Poor 14.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Poor 4.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Fair 1.8% |
Choctaw vs Subsaharan African Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 57.9%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 43.3%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.48%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.2%).
Disability Metric | Choctaw | Subsaharan African |
Disability | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 12.3% |
Males | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 11.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 25.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 52.7% | Tragic 48.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 2.6% |