Immigrants from Fiji vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,955,444 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.143. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.080% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to a decrease of 80.1 Sub-Saharan Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,954 compared to $84,235, a difference of 23.4%), median household income ($93,933 compared to $77,631, a difference of 21.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,952 compared to $90,691, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 1.8%), per capita income ($42,694 compared to $40,152, a difference of 6.3%), and median female earnings ($41,656 compared to $38,391, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 37.0%), single father poverty (13.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 27.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.88%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 37.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.62%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 13.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 75.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.6% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.88%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 25.6%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 17.3%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.45 compared to 3.25, a difference of 6.3%), currently married (46.2% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 8.4%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 68.7%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 56.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 20.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 45.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 52.4%), master's degree (12.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 14.7%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (63.4% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 0.31%), college, 1 year or more (56.9% compared to 57.3%, a difference of 0.62%), and nursery school (96.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.92% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 42.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (25.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 0.44%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.8%).