Scottish vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 499,024,381 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Scottish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.859. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.739% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scottish corresponds to an increase of 739.0 Sub-Saharan Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scottish and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 27.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,123 compared to $90,691, a difference of 12.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,622 compared to $84,235, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,397 compared to $38,391, a difference of 0.020%), householder income under 25 years ($50,554 compared to $48,691, a difference of 3.8%), and median earnings ($46,463 compared to $44,118, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scottish and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 42.7%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 36.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (14.0% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 2.0%), single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and single father poverty (17.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scottish and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.2%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 24.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scottish and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.7%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scottish and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 35.6%), married-couple households (49.0% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 17.8%), and currently married (49.2% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.91%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (64.5% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 80.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 30.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 6.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 18.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 26.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scottish and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 62.8%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 12.3%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.95%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.96%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 29.6%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 26.0%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.44%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.7%).