Immigrants from Barbados vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,814,830 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Immigrant from Barbados communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.130. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Barbados within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.219% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Barbados corresponds to an increase of 219.4 Sub-Saharan Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (17.8% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 27.9%), householder income under 25 years ($53,163 compared to $48,691, a difference of 9.2%), and median female earnings ($41,685 compared to $38,391, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,795 compared to $50,408, a difference of 0.77%), median family income ($92,419 compared to $93,748, a difference of 1.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,394 compared to $90,691, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 24.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 22.4%), and receiving food stamps (16.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (20.0% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.10%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.25%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (24.0% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 28.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 21.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.0% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 32.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.7% compared to 75.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.7%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 6.3%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 0.40%), family households (63.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 141.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 58.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.6% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 24.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.8% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 45.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 52.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 19.7%), no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.4%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (14.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.97% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 35.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 22.4%), and hearing disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.61%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.2%).