Immigrants from Belgium vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,161,556 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Immigrant from Belgium communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.403. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belgium within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.332% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belgium corresponds to an increase of 332.2 Sub-Saharan Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,082 compared to $40,152, a difference of 37.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,575 compared to $84,235, a difference of 33.6%), and median family income ($123,831 compared to $93,748, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,830 compared to $48,691, a difference of 12.6%), median female earnings ($44,587 compared to $38,391, a difference of 16.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,703 compared to $56,615, a difference of 23.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 46.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 40.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 8.6%), single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 10.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 21.4%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.94%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 75.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 46.5%), births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 31.0%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.0% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.25, a difference of 3.1%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 4.7%), no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.55%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 69.6%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 63.8%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.63%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 28.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 19.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 3.6%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and disability age over 75 (45.3% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 6.4%).