Immigrants from Italy vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 311,499,787 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Immigrant from Italy communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.320. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Italy within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.285% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Italy corresponds to an increase of 285.4 Sub-Saharan Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,201 compared to $84,235, a difference of 24.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,434 compared to $90,691, a difference of 21.8%), and per capita income ($48,654 compared to $40,152, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $38,391, a difference of 10.6%), householder income under 25 years ($54,449 compared to $48,691, a difference of 11.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,065 compared to $56,615, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (14.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 36.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 36.3%), and family poverty (8.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 3.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and single male poverty (12.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.88%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 35.2%), births to unmarried women (29.9% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 22.7%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.0%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (64.8% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 11.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 1.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 4.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 25.8%), master's degree (17.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 20.5%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 22.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 16.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 2.9%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 4.8%).