Immigrants from Russia vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 335,694,338 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.067. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.028% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to a decrease of 27.5 Sub-Saharan Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,044 compared to $40,152, a difference of 29.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,751 compared to $84,235, a difference of 29.1%), and median male earnings ($63,326 compared to $50,408, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,512 compared to $56,615, a difference of 14.0%), householder income under 25 years ($55,891 compared to $48,691, a difference of 14.8%), and wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 38.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 37.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and single father poverty (15.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 26.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 75.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.65%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 42.0%), births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 35.0%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.7%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 23.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 47.4%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 42.8%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.28%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 28.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.87%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 2.6%).