New Zealander vs Cuban Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,750,931 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.151. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.125% in Cubans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to a decrease of 124.5 Cubans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($67,333 compared to $49,152, a difference of 37.0%), median family income ($115,230 compared to $84,981, a difference of 35.6%), and per capita income ($50,575 compared to $37,383, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $50,655, a difference of 5.2%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 19.2%), and median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $34,942, a difference of 21.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 83.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 60.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.20%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.67%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.86%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 19.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 72.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 29.8%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 28.2%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.15%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.25, a difference of 3.1%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 19.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 0.67%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 81.9%), master's degree (18.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 51.3%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.87%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.90%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 22.8%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 18.2%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.1%), male disability (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.8%).