New Zealander vs Yugoslavian Community Comparison

COMPARE

New Zealander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yugoslavian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

New Zealanders

Yugoslavians

Excellent
Good
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,775
SOCIAL INDEX
65.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
143rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yugoslavian Integration in New Zealander Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,892,347 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.722. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.186% in Yugoslavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 186.3 Yugoslavians.
New Zealander Integration in Yugoslavian Communities

New Zealander vs Yugoslavian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $42,792, a difference of 18.2%), median household income ($95,146 compared to $82,186, a difference of 15.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,333 compared to $58,243, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.8%), householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $51,028, a difference of 4.4%), and median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $38,573, a difference of 10.0%).
New Zealander vs Yugoslavian Income
Income MetricNew ZealanderYugoslavian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$50,575
Fair
$42,792
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,230
Fair
$100,119
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,146
Poor
$82,186
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,246
Fair
$45,846
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,199
Fair
$53,967
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,446
Tragic
$38,573
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,294
Tragic
$51,028
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,085
Poor
$91,368
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,286
Fair
$97,558
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$67,333
Tragic
$58,243
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Tragic
26.7%

New Zealander vs Yugoslavian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 9.7%), receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.9%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.21%), male poverty (10.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.77%), and poverty (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.79%).
New Zealander vs Yugoslavian Poverty
Poverty MetricNew ZealanderYugoslavian
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Good
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.7%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Average
13.6%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.6%
Average
17.2%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.3%
Good
15.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Good
15.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.6%
Good
16.2%
Single Males
Poor
13.2%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Average
21.0%
Fair
21.2%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.6%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Average
29.1%
Fair
29.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
10.7%

New Zealander vs Yugoslavian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 12.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 10.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 0.65%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.85%).
New Zealander vs Yugoslavian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricNew ZealanderYugoslavian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Exceptional
15.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%

New Zealander vs Yugoslavian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.88%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.47%).
New Zealander vs Yugoslavian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricNew ZealanderYugoslavian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Exceptional
41.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.2%
Exceptional
78.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Exceptional
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.6%
Good
83.0%

New Zealander vs Yugoslavian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.3%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.3%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.22%), family households (62.9% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.38%).
New Zealander vs Yugoslavian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricNew ZealanderYugoslavian
Family Households
Tragic
62.9%
Tragic
63.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.2%
Fair
46.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.4%
Good
47.2%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.3%
Good
30.8%

New Zealander vs Yugoslavian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 13.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 0.21%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
New Zealander vs Yugoslavian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricNew ZealanderYugoslavian
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Exceptional
91.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.7%
Exceptional
56.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.4%
Good
19.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Average
6.3%

New Zealander vs Yugoslavian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 45.0%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 44.6%), and master's degree (18.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.030%), 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.15%).
New Zealander vs Yugoslavian Education Level
Education Level MetricNew ZealanderYugoslavian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
94.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.8%
Exceptional
92.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Exceptional
90.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Excellent
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.2%
Average
65.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Average
59.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.8%
Average
46.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.0%
Fair
37.1%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.3%
Fair
14.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.0%
Poor
4.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.5%
Poor
1.7%

New Zealander vs Yugoslavian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 18.7%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.1%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 2.0%).
New Zealander vs Yugoslavian Disability
Disability MetricNew ZealanderYugoslavian
Disability
Excellent
11.5%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.0%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
22.9%
Average
23.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Excellent
46.8%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Fair
17.4%
Good
17.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Fair
2.5%