New Zealander vs Immigrants from Central America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,490,491 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.221. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.223% in Immigrants from Central America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to a decrease of 223.4 Immigrants from Central America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $34,974, a difference of 44.6%), median family income ($115,230 compared to $85,050, a difference of 35.5%), and median male earnings ($61,199 compared to $45,538, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $51,022, a difference of 4.4%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 12.5%), and median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $33,953, a difference of 25.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 67.1%), receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 51.2%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 49.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 3.9%), single male poverty (13.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 24.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 43.5%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 43.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.0%), married-couple households (47.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 30.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 15.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 116.3%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 111.1%), and professional degree (6.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 107.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 17.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 16.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.3%).