New Zealander vs Immigrants from Philippines Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,729,162 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.776. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.632% in Immigrants from Philippines. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 631.5 Immigrants from Philippines.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $44,000, a difference of 14.9%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 12.3%), and median male earnings ($61,199 compared to $55,809, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($95,146 compared to $93,899, a difference of 1.3%), householder income over 65 years ($67,333 compared to $66,161, a difference of 1.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,085 compared to $102,910, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 30.1%), single male poverty (13.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 20.7%), and single father poverty (16.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.78%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.0%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.6%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.51%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.7%), family households (62.9% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 0.29%), currently married (47.4% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 31.8%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 19.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 54.3%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 53.6%), and professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 52.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.99%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.5%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.25%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.58%), and disability (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.1%).