New Zealander vs Welsh Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,331,596 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.802. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.500% in Welsh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 1,500.0 Welsh.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $43,233, a difference of 17.0%), median household income ($95,146 compared to $83,628, a difference of 13.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,085 compared to $93,039, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 4.3%), householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $50,597, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,286 compared to $100,322, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 11.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 8.3%), and single father poverty (16.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.070%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and female poverty (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 22.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.3%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.25%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.12, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (62.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 42.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 15.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 38.1%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 32.2%), and master's degree (18.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.8% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.010%), high school diploma (91.1% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 36.0%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 16.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 3.7%).