New Zealander vs Immigrants from Morocco Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,813,955 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Morocco within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.676. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.466% in Immigrants from Morocco. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 466.1 Immigrants from Morocco.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 15.0%), householder income over 65 years ($67,333 compared to $60,647, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,286 compared to $102,015, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $42,229, a difference of 0.51%), householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $54,593, a difference of 2.4%), and median earnings ($51,246 compared to $49,368, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.2%), receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 19.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.1%), single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.72%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.3%), married-couple households (47.2% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 0.050%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.32%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 27.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 24.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 12.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 23.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 35.0%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.5%), and professional degree (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.67%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.68%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.18%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.25%).