New Zealander vs Immigrants from Lithuania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,531,974 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.271. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.113% in Immigrants from Lithuania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 113.1 Immigrants from Lithuania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($61,199 compared to $63,346, a difference of 3.5%), householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $55,028, a difference of 3.3%), and wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($50,575 compared to $51,361, a difference of 1.5%), median household income ($95,146 compared to $96,836, a difference of 1.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,333 compared to $66,087, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 24.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 18.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 7.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 10.9%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 9.4%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.010%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (62.9% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 10.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.21%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.4%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and bachelor's degree (44.0% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.010%), 10th grade (95.0% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and 8th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 14.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.3%).