New Zealander vs Crow Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,738,521 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Crow within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.891. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.520% in Crow. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 1,519.6 Crow.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Crow communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $31,729, a difference of 59.4%), median family income ($115,230 compared to $76,605, a difference of 50.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,286 compared to $74,257, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $47,012, a difference of 13.4%), median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $35,266, a difference of 20.4%), and median earnings ($51,246 compared to $38,707, a difference of 32.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Crow communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 115.0%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 99.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.6% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 86.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 32.8%), receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 35.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 35.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Crow communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 248.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 231.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 227.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 26.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Crow communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 68.1%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 33.0%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.92%), family households (62.9% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Crow communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 10.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.85%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Crow communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 88.6%), master's degree (18.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 71.9%), and doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 69.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.9% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.12%), 10th grade (95.0% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.34%), and 11th grade (94.0% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Crow communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 33.3%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 31.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.62%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.4%).