New Zealander vs Immigrants from Venezuela Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,502,943 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Venezuela within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.532. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.149% in Immigrants from Venezuela. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 149.1 Immigrants from Venezuela.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Venezuela communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($115,230 compared to $94,904, a difference of 21.4%), per capita income ($50,575 compared to $41,727, a difference of 21.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,085 compared to $87,038, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 5.6%), householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $50,109, a difference of 6.4%), and median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $37,003, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Venezuela communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 31.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 26.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.42%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.55%), and single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Venezuela communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 19.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 14.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Venezuela communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Venezuela communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 19.6%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 10.8%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.34%), currently married (47.4% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.85%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.26, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Venezuela communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 26.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 1.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Venezuela communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 49.0%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 23.0%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.45%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Venezuela communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 22.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 1.3%).