Immigrants from Uganda vs Arapaho Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Uganda
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Arapaho
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Uganda

Arapaho

Good
Fair
6,298
SOCIAL INDEX
60.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
157th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Arapaho Integration in Immigrants from Uganda Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,320,362 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.136. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.155% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to an increase of 155.2 Arapaho.
Immigrants from Uganda Integration in Arapaho Communities

Immigrants from Uganda vs Arapaho Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,043 compared to $32,345, a difference of 39.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,584 compared to $75,945, a difference of 36.4%), and median male earnings ($56,064 compared to $41,758, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,976 compared to $59,383, a difference of 4.4%), wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,374 compared to $44,003, a difference of 19.0%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Arapaho Income
Income MetricImmigrants from UgandaArapaho
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,043
Tragic
$32,345
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,188
Tragic
$82,064
Median Household Income
Excellent
$87,553
Tragic
$67,965
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,041
Tragic
$36,586
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,064
Tragic
$41,758
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,739
Tragic
$31,489
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,374
Tragic
$44,003
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,698
Tragic
$71,697
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,584
Tragic
$75,945
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,976
Poor
$59,383
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
24.9%
Exceptional
23.5%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Arapaho Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.6% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 74.0%), single father poverty (16.7% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 43.4%), and family poverty (9.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 18.2%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Arapaho Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from UgandaArapaho
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Tragic
16.3%
Families
Average
9.1%
Tragic
12.7%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Fair
13.7%
Tragic
17.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
25.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Tragic
17.8%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.7%
Tragic
23.1%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Tragic
20.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
17.0%
Tragic
20.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Tragic
21.7%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Tragic
21.9%
Single Females
Excellent
20.3%
Tragic
26.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
24.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.3%
Tragic
33.4%
Married Couples
Average
5.2%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Tragic
11.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Poor
12.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.9%
Tragic
14.1%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Arapaho Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 156.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 146.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 137.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.7%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Arapaho Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from UgandaArapaho
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
9.8%
Males
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
11.0%
Females
Average
5.3%
Tragic
8.8%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Tragic
16.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
25.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
15.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
12.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Average
4.7%
Tragic
10.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Tragic
19.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
16.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
9.2%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Arapaho Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.2% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 5.2%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Arapaho Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from UgandaArapaho
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.5%
Tragic
62.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Tragic
74.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.2%
Excellent
37.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.0%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.0%
Tragic
76.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
81.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
78.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Tragic
77.1%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Arapaho Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 54.4%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 26.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.7% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 5.9%), married-couple households (44.6% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 6.7%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 8.2%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Arapaho Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from UgandaArapaho
Family Households
Tragic
62.7%
Exceptional
66.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
25.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.6%
Tragic
41.8%
Average Family Size
Good
3.23
Exceptional
3.64
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Tragic
7.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.0%
Tragic
40.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
14.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.5%
Tragic
47.1%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Arapaho Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 57.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 43.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 36.0%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Arapaho Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from UgandaArapaho
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.0%
Exceptional
7.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Exceptional
92.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
55.0%
Exceptional
60.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
26.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
9.4%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Arapaho Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 89.7%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 75.4%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 66.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.12%), high school diploma (88.9% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.9% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.53%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Arapaho Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from UgandaArapaho
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Poor
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Poor
97.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Fair
96.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Fair
96.0%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Average
94.8%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Exceptional
94.2%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.9%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Poor
88.6%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.7%
Tragic
82.8%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.5%
Tragic
60.3%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.9%
Tragic
54.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
36.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.7%
Tragic
26.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
10.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
2.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.2%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Arapaho Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 44.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 34.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 5.8%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 6.5%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 7.6%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Arapaho Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from UgandaArapaho
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
13.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.2%
Tragic
15.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.8%
Tragic
28.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Excellent
46.8%
Tragic
49.8%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
4.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%