Immigrants from Uganda vs Immigrants from Kuwait Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,489,697 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kuwait within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.047. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Kuwait. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to a decrease of 4.4 Immigrants from Kuwait.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($52,374 compared to $48,126, a difference of 8.8%), wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,976 compared to $64,433, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,739 compared to $41,055, a difference of 0.77%), median earnings ($48,041 compared to $48,861, a difference of 1.7%), and median household income ($87,553 compared to $89,263, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 18.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 10.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.020%), single female poverty (20.3% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and female poverty (13.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 28.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.45%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.2% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.2%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.5%), and births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.7% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 0.58%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 6.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.72%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 21.8%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 15.5%), and professional degree (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.25%), 3rd grade (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.26%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Kuwait communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 9.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.27%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.79%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 3.4%).