Immigrants from Uganda vs Malaysian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Uganda
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Malaysian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Uganda

Malaysians

Good
Fair
6,298
SOCIAL INDEX
60.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
157th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Malaysian Integration in Immigrants from Uganda Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,584,023 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.223. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.134% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to an increase of 133.6 Malaysians.
Immigrants from Uganda Integration in Malaysian Communities

Immigrants from Uganda vs Malaysian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,043 compared to $39,194, a difference of 14.9%), median family income ($106,188 compared to $95,230, a difference of 11.5%), and median male earnings ($56,064 compared to $50,772, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 0.44%), householder income under 25 years ($52,374 compared to $51,615, a difference of 1.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,976 compared to $58,244, a difference of 6.4%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Malaysian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from UgandaMalaysian
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,043
Tragic
$39,194
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,188
Tragic
$95,230
Median Household Income
Excellent
$87,553
Tragic
$81,064
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,041
Tragic
$43,844
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,064
Tragic
$50,772
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,739
Tragic
$37,298
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,374
Poor
$51,615
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,698
Tragic
$88,291
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,584
Tragic
$94,517
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,976
Tragic
$58,244
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
24.9%
Excellent
25.0%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Malaysian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 11.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 9.2%), and single female poverty (20.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.080%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.11%), and male poverty (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Malaysian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from UgandaMalaysian
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Tragic
13.1%
Families
Average
9.1%
Poor
9.6%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Fair
13.7%
Tragic
14.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.8%
Good
19.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Tragic
14.7%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.7%
Tragic
18.4%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
17.0%
Tragic
17.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Tragic
17.8%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Excellent
20.3%
Tragic
22.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.3%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Average
5.2%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.9%
Tragic
12.7%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Malaysian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 24.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.57%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.65%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Malaysian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from UgandaMalaysian
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Average
5.3%
Males
Fair
5.4%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Average
5.3%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Average
4.7%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Poor
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Fair
5.5%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Malaysian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.2% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Malaysian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from UgandaMalaysian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.5%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Fair
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.2%
Exceptional
39.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.0%
Exceptional
77.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.0%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Tragic
82.0%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Malaysian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.6%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 11.2%), and births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.0% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 2.0%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.31, a difference of 2.3%), and married-couple households (44.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.8%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Malaysian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from UgandaMalaysian
Family Households
Tragic
62.7%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
29.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.6%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Good
3.23
Exceptional
3.31
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.0%
Poor
45.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.5%
Tragic
33.9%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Malaysian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 29.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 29.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 23.0%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Malaysian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from UgandaMalaysian
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.0%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
55.0%
Exceptional
59.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
7.7%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Malaysian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 52.0%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 48.6%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.62%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.62%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.63%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Malaysian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from UgandaMalaysian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Poor
97.9%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
97.2%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
97.2%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Tragic
97.1%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Tragic
97.0%
4th Grade
Poor
97.4%
Tragic
96.7%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Tragic
96.5%
6th Grade
Fair
96.9%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Fair
96.0%
Tragic
94.8%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Average
94.8%
Tragic
93.5%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Tragic
92.2%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Tragic
90.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.9%
Tragic
89.2%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Tragic
87.0%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.7%
Tragic
83.3%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.5%
Tragic
62.2%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.9%
Tragic
55.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
41.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.7%
Tragic
32.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
12.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Malaysian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 12.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.8% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 11.5%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 4.7%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Malaysian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from UgandaMalaysian
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.2%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.8%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Excellent
46.8%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.5%