Immigrants from Uganda vs Immigrants from Mexico Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,564,816 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.343. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.395% in Immigrants from Mexico. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to a decrease of 395.2 Immigrants from Mexico.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,043 compared to $33,931, a difference of 32.8%), median family income ($106,188 compared to $83,639, a difference of 27.0%), and median male earnings ($56,064 compared to $44,960, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 1.4%), householder income under 25 years ($52,374 compared to $50,422, a difference of 3.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,976 compared to $52,801, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 46.0%), family poverty (9.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 35.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.8% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.9%), single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 22.2%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.2% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 11.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 27.5%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 24.2%), and births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.0% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 1.0%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and married-couple households (44.6% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 51.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 33.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 9.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 22.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 100.2%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 90.7%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 78.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 20.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 19.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.2%).