Immigrants from Uganda vs Immigrants from Belgium Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,134,236 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belgium within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.592. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.098% in Immigrants from Belgium. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to an increase of 98.4 Immigrants from Belgium.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,043 compared to $55,082, a difference of 22.3%), median male earnings ($56,064 compared to $66,125, a difference of 17.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,698 compared to $112,575, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,374 compared to $54,830, a difference of 4.7%), median female earnings ($40,739 compared to $44,587, a difference of 9.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,976 compared to $69,703, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 23.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 19.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.59%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and single female poverty (20.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 19.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.2% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.0%), and births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.7% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 0.39%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.15, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 17.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 0.060%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 37.8%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 33.1%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.47%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and 3rd grade (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 14.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.050%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.40%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.0%).