Immigrants from Uganda vs Spanish American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,047,433 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish Americans within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.840. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.979% in Spanish Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to an increase of 978.6 Spanish Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Spanish American communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,584 compared to $87,836, a difference of 17.9%), median family income ($106,188 compared to $90,322, a difference of 17.6%), and median household income ($87,553 compared to $75,386, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 1.2%), householder income over 65 years ($61,976 compared to $57,021, a difference of 8.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,374 compared to $46,913, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Spanish American communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 23.9%), family poverty (9.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 23.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.95%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Spanish American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 27.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Spanish American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.2% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Spanish American communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 26.4%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 17.8%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.0% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 0.060%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.25%), and married-couple households (44.6% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Spanish American communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 34.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 25.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Spanish American communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 29.6%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 29.4%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.070%), 6th grade (96.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and 3rd grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Spanish American communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 41.2%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 38.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.60%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.86%), and disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 6.9%).