Immigrants from Uganda vs Immigrants from Iraq Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,119,549 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Iraq within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.677. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.161% in Immigrants from Iraq. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to an increase of 160.7 Immigrants from Iraq.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,043 compared to $41,365, a difference of 8.9%), median female earnings ($40,739 compared to $37,864, a difference of 7.6%), and median family income ($106,188 compared to $98,786, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,374 compared to $53,384, a difference of 1.9%), householder income over 65 years ($61,976 compared to $59,824, a difference of 3.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,584 compared to $98,201, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 17.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 10.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (17.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.0%), family poverty (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and single female poverty (20.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 31.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 17.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.67%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.2% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 12.4%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.4%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.020%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.070%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 33.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 30.5%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 21.4%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.0% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.0%), 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.0%), and 9th grade (94.8% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 18.0%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 10.7%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.28%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.99%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.0%).