Immigrants from Uganda vs Immigrants from Scotland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,651,867 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.743. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.152% in Immigrants from Scotland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to an increase of 152.5 Immigrants from Scotland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 15.2%), per capita income ($45,043 compared to $49,893, a difference of 10.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,698 compared to $105,089, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,374 compared to $52,638, a difference of 0.50%), median female earnings ($40,739 compared to $41,771, a difference of 2.5%), and median earnings ($48,041 compared to $50,741, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 32.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 25.0%), and family poverty (9.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.13%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.47%), and single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 15.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 15.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.2% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 19.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.7%), and married-couple households (44.6% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 0.37%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (62.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 20.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 13.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 42.0%), master's degree (16.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and associate's degree (48.5% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.57%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.58%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 19.2%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 16.5%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.19%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and female disability (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.1%).