Immigrants from Uganda vs Immigrants from Hungary Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,625,885 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hungary within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.633. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.278% in Immigrants from Hungary. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to an increase of 277.6 Immigrants from Hungary.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,043 compared to $49,303, a difference of 9.5%), wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,698 compared to $102,655, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,374 compared to $52,798, a difference of 0.81%), median female earnings ($40,739 compared to $41,820, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,976 compared to $64,277, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 15.0%), male poverty (11.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 11.1%), and poverty (12.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.28%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.46%), and single female poverty (20.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 19.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.70%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.78%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.2% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 16.1%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.6%), and married-couple households (44.6% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.7% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.4%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.17, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 11.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.36%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 20.3%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.2%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.25%), 3rd grade (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.26%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 19.1%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 9.4%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.49%), female disability (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.96%), and disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 1.5%).