Immigrants from Uganda vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,418,700 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.074. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to an increase of 8.6 Immigrants from Nicaragua.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($106,188 compared to $88,267, a difference of 20.3%), householder income over 65 years ($61,976 compared to $52,085, a difference of 19.0%), and per capita income ($45,043 compared to $38,065, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,374 compared to $53,266, a difference of 1.7%), wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,698 compared to $84,914, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 49.5%), receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 44.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.77%), single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and single female poverty (20.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 11.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.40%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.2% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 24.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 24.5%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 13.4%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.6% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 0.19%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 9.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.77%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.060%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 0.76%), and no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 62.8%), master's degree (16.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 40.5%), and professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.95%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.97%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 18.5%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.5%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.060%), disability (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and female disability (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.68%).