Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Philippines Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,229,827 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines within Ghanaian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.173. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ghanaians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.063% in Immigrants from Philippines. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ghanaians corresponds to an increase of 63.2 Immigrants from Philippines.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,137 compared to $102,910, a difference of 14.2%), median household income ($83,582 compared to $93,899, a difference of 12.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,277 compared to $108,471, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,429 compared to $41,114, a difference of 1.7%), median earnings ($46,440 compared to $48,266, a difference of 3.9%), and per capita income ($42,164 compared to $44,000, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (18.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 31.8%), receiving food stamps (14.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 30.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 10.9%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 16.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 17.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 28.9%), married-couple households (42.2% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 16.8%), and births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.5% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 1.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.37, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 92.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 62.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.6% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 9.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.0% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 25.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 45.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 14.1%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 12.5%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (91.5% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 17.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.92%), disability (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and male disability (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.3%).