Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,416,845 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Ghanaian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.062. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ghanaians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ghanaians corresponds to a decrease of 5.0 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 10.3%), householder income over 65 years ($60,043 compared to $56,975, a difference of 5.4%), and per capita income ($42,164 compared to $43,997, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($52,810 compared to $52,860, a difference of 0.10%), householder income under 25 years ($52,594 compared to $52,302, a difference of 0.56%), and median family income ($98,877 compared to $98,205, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 11.8%), receiving food stamps (14.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 11.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.35%), single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.9%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 16.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.86%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.89%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.83%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 16.5%), married-couple households (42.2% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and currently married (42.9% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.32%), family households (63.5% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.65%), and births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 37.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.0% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (83.6% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (83.6% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.0%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 8.9%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (45.8% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 0.0%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and high school diploma (87.7% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 12.8%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.10%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.6%).