Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Nepal Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ghanaian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Nepal
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ghanaians

Immigrants from Nepal

Fair
Good
2,403
SOCIAL INDEX
21.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
261st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,773
SOCIAL INDEX
75.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
106th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Nepal Integration in Ghanaian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,682,221 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal within Ghanaian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.176. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ghanaians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Immigrants from Nepal. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ghanaians corresponds to an increase of 21.3 Immigrants from Nepal.
Ghanaian Integration in Immigrants from Nepal Communities

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Nepal Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 11.4%), median family income ($98,877 compared to $104,966, a difference of 6.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,137 compared to $95,322, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,594 compared to $52,611, a difference of 0.030%), median female earnings ($40,429 compared to $40,704, a difference of 0.68%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,043 compared to $61,843, a difference of 3.0%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Nepal Income
Income MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Nepal
Per Capita Income
Poor
$42,164
Good
$44,187
Median Family Income
Poor
$98,877
Good
$104,966
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,582
Good
$87,046
Median Earnings
Average
$46,440
Excellent
$47,925
Median Male Earnings
Poor
$52,810
Good
$55,615
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,429
Excellent
$40,704
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,594
Good
$52,611
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$90,137
Good
$95,322
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$97,277
Good
$102,190
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Fair
$60,043
Good
$61,843
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.3%
Excellent
24.9%

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Nepal Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 32.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 23.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.51%), single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 6.4%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Nepal Poverty
Poverty MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Nepal
Poverty
Tragic
13.9%
Good
12.2%
Families
Tragic
10.3%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Good
11.0%
Females
Tragic
14.7%
Good
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Excellent
16.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.6%
Good
15.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Good
15.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.5%
Good
15.9%
Single Males
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Exceptional
20.3%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.7%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.4%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.0%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
10.6%

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Nepal Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 28.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 26.6%), and male unemployment (6.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 12.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.1%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Nepal Unemployment
Unemployment MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Nepal
Unemployment
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.1%

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Nepal Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Nepal Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Nepal
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
68.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Exceptional
81.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.3%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.3%
Exceptional
76.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Exceptional
84.0%

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Nepal Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 22.4%), births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 15.8%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.39%), family households (63.5% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.21, a difference of 2.5%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Nepal Family Structure
Family Structure MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Nepal
Family Households
Tragic
63.5%
Tragic
62.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.2%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Poor
3.21
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.8%
Fair
6.4%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.9%
Fair
46.1%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.3%
Exceptional
29.6%

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Nepal Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 56.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.0% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (83.6% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 7.8%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Nepal Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Nepal
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.4%
Average
10.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
83.6%
Fair
89.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
48.0%
Tragic
53.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
17.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Nepal Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.7%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.6%), and no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.27%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.28%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Nepal Education Level
Education Level MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Nepal
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Fair
95.9%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Fair
94.8%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.8%
Average
93.7%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.5%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Average
91.2%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.7%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.3%
Good
86.2%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
63.9%
Exceptional
67.5%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.4%
Exceptional
62.0%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Exceptional
49.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
38.0%
Exceptional
41.7%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Exceptional
17.0%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Exceptional
2.2%

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Nepal Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 15.6%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.5%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.5%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Nepal Disability
Disability MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Nepal
Disability
Excellent
11.5%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Good
12.1%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Exceptional
1.0%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Average
6.6%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.1%
Excellent
22.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.5%
Exceptional
46.6%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Good
6.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Exceptional
2.2%