Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Dominican Republic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,737,827 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Dominican Republic within Ghanaian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.121. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ghanaians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.230% in Immigrants from Dominican Republic. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ghanaians corresponds to a decrease of 230.0 Immigrants from Dominican Republic.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($60,043 compared to $45,758, a difference of 31.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,277 compared to $78,836, a difference of 23.4%), and median family income ($98,877 compared to $81,233, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,594 compared to $50,204, a difference of 4.8%), wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and median female earnings ($40,429 compared to $36,857, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.0% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 58.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 47.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 5.6%), single father poverty (16.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 10.5%), and single male poverty (13.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 28.7%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.1%), and male unemployment (6.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 13.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 71.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 21.1%), births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 17.0%), and married-couple households (42.2% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.24%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.35, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 91.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 60.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.6% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 21.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.0% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 44.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 56.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 43.4%), no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 32.9%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.89%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.90%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 22.9%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 18.3%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.5%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.1%).